Race to See Who Can Be Florida’s Most Anti-Illegal Immigration Candidate

Florida Coast - Photo: Seamoor/flickr

Cuban boats on Florida shoreline. (Photo: Seamoor/flickr)

Tuesday’s Republican gubernatorial primary in Florida is a face-off between newcomer Rick Scott, a wealthy health care executive, and the state’s attorney general Bill McCollum, a political veteran. The winner will ultimately compete against Democrat Alex Sink, Florida’s chief financial officer, and independent Lawton “Bud” Chiles, the son of a popular governor and U.S. senator.  An Aug. 19 Quinnipiac University poll showed Sink with a slight edge over both GOP candidates, but that might just be due to Republican infighting.

Scott and McCollum are waging a fierce battle of TV ads, in which they try to out-do each other in opposing illegal immigration. It was Scott’s fierce attacks that pushed McCollum to switch his position on SB 1070,  Arizona’s controversial new immigration law. McCollum initially said he didn’t think Florida should enact a similar law, but ultimately came around to proposing an even harsher measure for the Sunshine State.  Rubén Funes, the editor of La Prensa, a Spanish-language newspaper in Central Florida, says McCollum hadn’t really touched the immigration issue before his campaign for governor.

“The reaction of immigrants here in Central Florida was complete surprise, because they didn’t consider McCollum an anti-immigration guy,” said Funes.

In an effort to court Florida’s Republican constituency, particularly in a region where the Tea Party movement is gaining influence, McCollum chose the politically expedient thing to do, and that was to sound off about undocumented immigrants.

“It’s no coincidence that McCollum’s change in position resulted in his rise in polls,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

But even as McCollum’s strong anti-illegal immigrant stance won support among conservative white voters, it took a number of Hispanics in Florida by surprise, and cost him support among some Latino GOP leaders. The Miami Herald reports that McCollum was criticized by U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, an outspoken conservative Republican from Miami.

“I’m disappointed and was blindsided by Bill’s decision to promote this, and I encourage the candidates to focus on plans that will improve Florida’s economy, bring jobs to our state and jump-start our tourism,” Ros-Lehtinen said. “I fail to see how promotion of this issue will accomplish that, and I was taken aback.”

The GOP has a history of strong support by Hispanic voters in Florida, mainly among the Cuban exile population in the southern part of the state.  Ros-Lehtinen is Cuban American, and her reaction to McCollum’s immigration is notable, since many Cuban-Americans are critical of undocumented immigration.  Marco Rubio, a Cuban-American who is running to represent the state in the U.S. Senate has spoken about the country’s “runaway illegal immigration problem.”

Though older Cuban voters tend to be hard-line Republicans, in Central Florida, people of Puerto Rican descent account for about 40% of Hispanic voters, and they are largely Democrats. A recent National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) breakdown of the state’s evolving electorate showed that overall, 39% of the state’s Hispanic population is Democratic, while 32% is Republican and 29% identifies as “other.”

Central Florida is often the region that swings state elections, and Funes noted he’s seen growing unease about racial profiling among Puerto Ricans who live there. If McCollum or Scott’s immigration proposals were to be enacted, local police would be required to check the status of individuals they suspect of being undocumented.

“Even though they are legal, they are thinking now they might be affected by immigration law because they look Mexican. A lot of them are realizing that they might be asked for papers and they don’t like that,” Funes told Fi2W.

But the editor of La Prensa says that despite all the media attention, it’s “unlikely” a law like SB 1070 would pass in the Florida legislature, and he considers McCollum’s immigration proposal political posturing more than anything else.  “I was surprised by McCollum, I’ve known him for years, and I thought he was a sensible guy, but I guess when you think you’re going to lose anything can happen,” Funes said.

Republican lobbyist and fundraiser Ana Navarro, also told the Herald she could no longer support McCollum after his immigration proposal.

“I will not campaign against McCollum but will also not lift a finger or raise one additional dollar to support his campaign,” she said. “Though I believe McCollum is far better prepared to be governor than Rick Scott, I cannot bring myself to cast a vote for either.”

The NALEO report shows a new influx of Central and South American immigrants into both South and Central Florida, as well as a second generation of young Cubans who have less of a connection to the Republican party. But even though the new immigrants, many of whom are undocumented, may have the most at stake when it comes to immigration laws, their clout at the polls is muted. Hispanics make up 21% of the state’s total population, but only 13% of its registered voters. Yet the report also shows that Hispanics are the fastest growing group of voters in Florida.

Polls suggest a close race for governor in the general election, regardless of who wins Tuesday’s primary.  The candidates’ stand on illegal immigration could help swing the Hispanic vote. Latino independents and Democrats may rally to support Sink because they see her as pro-immigrant. And if the reaction by Republican Hispanic leaders to McCollum’s immigration proposal is any indication, rank-and-file Hispanic Republicans may stay home on election day, giving Sink an extra advantage.

    Tagged as: , , , , , , , , ,

    • Facts

      What both these Republicans FORGOT to Mention in their SPIN POLITICS is that

      It’s all about economics! Removing undocumented workers from the U.S. would total a loss of $1.8 trillion in annual spending and $651.5 billion in annual economic output, according to a study by the economic analysis firm The Perryman Group. It would cost about $28 billion per year to apprehend illegal immigrants, $6 billion a year to detain them, $500 million for extra beds, $2 million to judicially process them and $1.6 billion to transport them home. $230 Billion is the estimated amount it would cost over the next five years to enact the scenario of the mass-deportation caucus and deport the undocumented population, according to a report by the Center for American Progress. Legalization of undocumented immigrants would significantly expand the economy—by a cumulative $1.5 trillion in gross domestic product over 10 years. A deportation approach, by contrast, would have the cumulative effect of draining $2.5 trillion over 10 years from the U.S. economy. Illegal immigrants are paying their share of taxes, they pay the same taxes as you and me when they purchase anything, They don’t carry a card that says Undocumented Immigrant, DON’T CHARGE TAXES
      Start looking at FACTS & NUMBERS.

    • Facts

      THE FACTS ARE THAT BOTH THESE GUYS AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE DOING THIS TO GET REELECTED, HERE ARE FACTS.

      1, HOW MUCH MONEY $$$$$$$ IS ALLOCATED TO ENFORCE THIS LAW?? NONE.

      2, HOW MANY NEW POLICEMEN / WOMEN SHES HIRED TO HOLD AND PROCESS THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS? NONE.

      3, HOW MANY NEW IMMIGRATION JUDGES SHES HIRED TO PROCESS THE THOUSANDS OF DEPORTATION CASES?? NONE.

      4, HOW MANY NEW JAILS SHES BUILT TO HOLD THE THOUSANDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS? NONE.

      5, HOW MANY BUSES / PLANES SHES BROUGHT TO DEPORT THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF THOSE WHO ARE ORDERED BY THE IMMIGRATION JUDGES TO BE DEPORTED?? NONE.

      CAN ANYONE ANSWER THESE FACTS? THE REPUBLICAN STATES ARE TRYING TO MAKE THIS THEIR PLATFORM, THEY WILL LOSE BIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG TIME.
      ALL ARE GODS CHILDREN. NO HUMAN IS ABOVE ANOTHER. ALL ARE CREATED BY ONE ALMIGHTY GOD WHO LOVES ALL HIS CHILDREN.
      I AM NOT SAYING DON’T CLOSE THE BORDERS I AM SAYING STOP THE FOOLISH HATE AND IGNORANCE.

    • Facts

      http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider-gop-destroyed-us-economy-2010-08-10

      This week, the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) came out with a report entitled, The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers, which discusses the costs of unauthorized immigration to the United States. As usual, FAIR has put out a highly misleading fiscal snapshot of the costs allegedly imposed on U.S. taxpayers by unauthorized immigrants and completely discounts the economic contributions of unauthorized workers and consumers. Moreover, FAIR inflates their costs in a variety of ways and conveniently ignores any contributions that would offset these costs.

      While the publication is long and deals with a wide range of issues that warrant more dissection by credible economic experts, the trade publication Education Week has already begun the deconstruction with an item that sheds light on their misleading claims about providing English language services in schools.

      Another argument FAIR makes, which makes it hard to glean what their solution would be is the high cost of deporting undocumented workers which FAIR blames on the immigrants themselves. It’s a somewhat circular argument to say that the cost of undocumented immigrants includes the cost of failing law enforcement efforts. So, in essence, FAIR is saying that the deport-them-all approach costs too much money and doesn’t work. Yet their “solution” is to spend even more money on enforcement.

      FAIR’s data is meant only to reinforce their vision of “attrition through enforcement.” It is not rooted in an effort to move the immigration debate forward. Therefore, passing comprehensive immigration reform – which would yield a cumulative $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years – is the only sound economic decision the United States can make.

      SOURCE Immigration Policy Center

    • Pingback: Human Rights Roundup (8/23/2010) | Human Rights Initiative of North Texas, Inc.

    • Jacks

      What I want to know is why nobody is talking about this new Republican bill idea in Congress that they say will save taxpayers $400 billion, and put an end to illegal immigration once and for all? All of my friends read the 4 pages bill and we never agree on anything but we loved this bill idea so why is it such a secret?

      Here is a link to the article with the bill link in it if anyone is interested…

      New Immigration Bill Avoids Amnesty
      http://xelanbonn.com/3540/new-immigration-bill-avoids-amnesty/

    • Sam

      Enough is enough! Legal U.S citizens unite! Help take the steps to save our country take our jobs back and stop this illegal immigrant invasion. What ever happen to taking real action like President Eisenhower’s “Operation Wetback” from 1954 and the American way of mass round ups of illegals aliens, Spy’s & Terrorist and sending them home or imprisoning them? Isn’t that what we have a military for? Support our cause before illegal immigrant criminals have more rights than us. If other online articles report unemployment is around 20% and there are 310 million in the U.S census reports. Then there is as many as 62 million people in the U.S that are unemployed & are able to work full-time. Do we have to reach 150 million unemployed before we take action? American’s better wake up!

      The Republican’s only help the top five percent the income earners in the U.S.A. I have some news for all you that earn 100k per year and think you are wealthy & therefore vote republican. YOU ARE NOWHERE NEAR THE 5% THAT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS HELPING. The republicans laugh at you! They can’t believe that you vote for them, but they will take your vote as they promote your job going over seas and give them self’s raises. Also we must take steps to lower local city and state councilmen salaries too they are all robbing & hurting the people they serve. So please read and sign this online petition. “Petition to Reduce the Wages of Congress Men and Women from $174,000 per year to $50,000 per year at “change.org’. ” Link is below!

      http://uspoverty.change.org/petitions/view/petition_to_reduce_the_wages_of_congress_men_and_women_from_174000_per_year_to_50000_per_year

      Pass it on!

      *COMMENT EDITED BY Fi2W FOR LANGUAGE*